<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><!-- generator="b2evolution/5.0.9-stable" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Reflections On The Past - Latest Comments on Marriage Banns, Marriage Bonds, and Marriage by Bond</title>
		<link>http://history.brazoriaresearch.com/?disp=comments</link>
		<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://history.brazoriaresearch.com/?tempskin=_rss2&#38;disp=comments&#38;p=64" />
		<description></description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
		<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://b2evolution.net/?v=5.0.9-stable"/>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<item>
			<title> Hugh [Visitor] in response to: Marriage Banns, Marriage Bonds, and Marriage by Bond</title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2018 02:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator><span class="user anonymous" rel="bubbletip_comment_21331">Hugh</span> [Visitor]</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">c21331@http://history.brazoriaresearch.com/</guid>
			<description>After statehood, did Texas ever have marriage bonds in a more traditional sense?  Or was it strictly by simple issue of license?</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[After statehood, did Texas ever have marriage bonds in a more traditional sense?  Or was it strictly by simple issue of license?]]></content:encoded>
			<link>http://history.brazoriaresearch.com/2015/06/21/marriage-banns-marriage-bonds-and#c21331</link>
		</item>
			</channel>
</rss>
